wacky TSCC theory #352
Dec. 8th, 2009 02:17 amIt's really not so wacky (your heads are safe).
I don't think Derek killed Jesse, so I've been trying to figure out if we'd ever run into her again in present day. I can't see any reason to have a time traveler wandering about without being part of the story, so we must not be be done with her. But with Riley dead, Derek dead, John away in the future and Cameron out of commission, Jesse doesn't exactly have anything to do these days. Hmm...
The miscarriage tidbit they shoehorned into her story at the last minute didn't make any sense at all. In fact, I thought it weakened the character considerably. Instead of being a dedicated soldier trying to fix her commander, she became a chick with a personal grudge. That's no good at all. And we know TSCC is better than that. So then why the miscarriage? It's not like it died with Jesse's story either; Cameron mentions it to Derek in To the Lighthouse ("You lost a child. Sarah almost lost her child."). There must be more to it.
( Try this on for size... )
I don't think Derek killed Jesse, so I've been trying to figure out if we'd ever run into her again in present day. I can't see any reason to have a time traveler wandering about without being part of the story, so we must not be be done with her. But with Riley dead, Derek dead, John away in the future and Cameron out of commission, Jesse doesn't exactly have anything to do these days. Hmm...
The miscarriage tidbit they shoehorned into her story at the last minute didn't make any sense at all. In fact, I thought it weakened the character considerably. Instead of being a dedicated soldier trying to fix her commander, she became a chick with a personal grudge. That's no good at all. And we know TSCC is better than that. So then why the miscarriage? It's not like it died with Jesse's story either; Cameron mentions it to Derek in To the Lighthouse ("You lost a child. Sarah almost lost her child."). There must be more to it.
( Try this on for size... )