Page Summary
spectralbovine.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sabaceanbabe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gothamite66.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sabaceanbabe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spectralbovine.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gothamite66.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sabaceanbabe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
caporali.livejournal.com - (no subject)
smacky-ff.livejournal.com - (no subject)
caporali.livejournal.com - (no subject)
loganwaters.livejournal.com - Indeed.
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bobmacpharson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roxybisquaint.livejournal.com - Re: Indeed.
zanpakto.livejournal.com - (no subject)
loganwaters.livejournal.com - A thought...
usagiko.livejournal.com - (no subject)
usagiko.livejournal.com - Re: A thought...
Style Credit
- Style: Atomic Orange for Funky Circles by
- Resources: Stuck in Tokyo
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:50 pm (UTC)Couldn't say it better.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 05:04 pm (UTC)I mean, I really have no idea what role the media and critics play in these decisions, but I do know that if I were a network, I'd care more about the show everyone was talking about, you know? I could be making stuff up.
I'm actually kind of surprised how little I'm affected. I broke down crying when Veronica Mars was finally cancelled, and that sure wasn't that big of a surprise either. That was different, though, I guess. You're into SCC the way I was into VM. Probably more.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 05:08 pm (UTC)I feel like I lost a family member.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 05:35 pm (UTC)I don't want to be bitter at Dollhouse or wish for it's demise because it's petty and cruel to Dollhouse fans who might very well be in this same position in December or May of next year. But honestly, I don't know if I can help myself. I don't think I can help but wish for Fox's Friday night to crash and burn.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 05:39 pm (UTC)I will never understand the so-called mind of the TV executive.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 05:45 pm (UTC)You deserve some kind of medal for actually making me crack a smile today.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 06:49 pm (UTC)(I know, this is the third time I've posted this reply over 3 different TSCC-related LJs... I apologize for the repetition, if this is the third time you've read this!)
Indeed.
on 2009-05-18 07:03 pm (UTC)It was just too smart for network TV, too smart for the casual viewers who wanted mayhem every second, and certainly too smart for the suits at Fox. This was the Sopranos of SF, and they let it die.
Congrats, guys, you've outdone NBC's short-sightedness in canceling ST:TOS in 1969. Just as stupid a decision, but after seeing all the revenue lost with ST, you really should have known better.
Roxy, thanks for the great commentary and the wonderful Comicals.
You're too smart for network TV too.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-05-18 07:13 pm (UTC)Dollhouse's 13th episode was produced with a skeleton budget. Joss relied heavily on that for his pitch for Season 2 - demonstrating he could produce the show for much less. A deal was worked out in which Fox shoulders a lower percentage of the cost.
My question for you guys (I do not intend this as flame bait at all, it's an honest question) is this: judging from various comments across the board, it's pretty obvious by this point that what really sealed the deal on the show was the middle Sarah arc, which disappointed most of the target demographic at a time when they really needed to be revitalized.
If hypothetically, you had a choice to get 9 more episodes of average level Sarah-centric-ness, at the cost of the middle Sarah Arc getting replaced by something with lots of explosions and Summer Glau, would you do it? Would you answer change depending on how many more episodes could be guarranteed?
no subject
on 2009-05-18 07:14 pm (UTC)Re: Indeed.
on 2009-05-18 07:19 pm (UTC)It was just too smart for network TV, too smart for the casual viewers who wanted mayhem every second, and certainly too smart for the suits at Fox.
Perfectly said.
Roxy, thanks for the great commentary and the wonderful Comicals.
You're too smart for network TV too.
Aw. Thanks :)
Oh man, this sucks. This really truly sucks. I don't want this fandom to disappear. I like it. I like everyone I've met because of it. And maybe that's what saddens me most — thinking all these good times are done or will gradually dwindle.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 07:35 pm (UTC)maybe this will cheer you up a little. It helped me.
But yea, I feel like dumping my TV on FOX's lawn.
A thought...
on 2009-05-18 07:44 pm (UTC)Very cathartic, I should think.
no subject
on 2009-05-18 08:21 pm (UTC)Re: A thought...
on 2009-05-18 08:21 pm (UTC)